The federal prosecutor accused him of being an art maker Robbie Bina News He lied or concealed information about the income of one of his businesses from the Puerto Rico government.
Meanwhile, Bina Nivez’s defense pointed out that the affair was caused by an error and not for an illegal purpose.
The public ministry’s complaint was filed in federal court in San Juan, so it can be considered a “factor” when deciding what kind of sentence Judge Francisco Bezosa will impose on Bina Nives. The moment is pending. Scheduled for April 18th.
A motion signed by attorneys María Montañez and José Ruiz stipulates that every company earning more than $ 3 million must submit to the State Department of Puerto Rico an annual report with financial statements audited by an authorized public accountant.
In this movement, prosecutors in a statement he submitted to the State Department on July 31, 2020, under the penalty of contempt, reported that Bina Nieves’ business volume for 2019 was “not more than $ 3 million”.
However, according to lawyers, the company received $ 16,768.17 in revenue for the year before the Treasury Department.
“Evidence shows that the defendant submitted a false report to the State Department of Puerto Rico on July 31, 2020, under the penalty of contempt, when he pointed out that the amount of business not exceeding $ 3,000,000 for 2019 on July 31, 2020 was Mr. Soldout Inc.”Supported the movement of lawyers.
For her part, attorney Maria Dominguez, defense attorney, did not deny the attorneys’ complaint and responded that there was a discrepancy due to an error.
He stressed that it is common knowledge that Bina Nives is a successful entrepreneur and executive in the music industry. Due to the demands of running various businesses, Mr. Bina Nives relies on clerks and professional accountants and consultants to manage her financial and corporate affairs.”.
He emphasized that the letter was not a signal of a formal antitrust inquiry into the allegations, but rather a signal of a formal antitrust inquiry into the allegations.
In a statement to the State Department on July 31, 2020, Dominguez promised that “this is an electronic presentation made by Bina Neves, an authorized public accountant, on his behalf.”
“Because of Bina Neves’ trust in her accounting advisers, she was unaware of the mistake that had been made in submitting the annual report, and I am grateful that the government has brought this matter to its attention,” Dominguez said.
“As soon as this information was reported by this attorney, he ordered his accountants to file an amended annual report with the Puerto Rico State Department that corrected this information,” he said.
According to Domínguez, there is no benefit to his client from reporting that he has earned less.
Similarly, the Ministry of Public Works “condemned the corporation for misrepresenting the annual business size for the State Department (as noted in the announcement) that it may have sought a strategic advantage to provoke Pina Nivez to publish this false report. However, that is not the case. “
In that regard, he stressed that not only the treasury, but also the Kagos municipality and other companies have been informed of the exact amount.
He also blamed delays in certain procedures related to closures and other activities imposed by the COVID-19 epidemic.
“Mr. Bina-Nivez’s business success, his contributions to the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico’s economy and the legal fulfillment of his tax liabilities are factors that should be considered positively by the Honorable Court during the sentencing,” Dominguez said.
The debate arises at a time Judge Bezosa demands that protection Bina Nives is allowed to remain on bail while her case is pending Court of Appeals for the First Round in BostonAt the same time The The government side opposes If imprisonment, he asks to be allowed.
An arbitral tribunal Was found guilty Cogas told Bina Nivez last December for illegally possessing firearms in one of his homes located in Real Urbanization.
Immediately, his party announced that it was going to appeal the case. He alleged that errors were made that affected his client during the test, which was rejected by the Ministry of Public Works.